Search This Blog

Monday, 29 October 2012

Disability Evaluation Under Social Security USA

http://www.ssa.gov/disability/professionals/bluebook/1.00-Musculoskeletal-Adult.htm

Abstract more from the link above
Love Sharon xx soft hugs xx


Professionals HomeSSA logo: link to Social Security Online home

Medical/Professional Relations



Adult Listings (Part A)


Childhood Listings (Part B)


General Information

Disability Evaluation Under Social Security
(Blue Book- September 2008)

1.00 Musculoskeletal System - Adult
 

Section1.00 Musculoskeletal System

A. Disorders of the musculoskeletal system may result from hereditary, congenital, or acquired pathologic processes. Impairments may result from infectious, inflammatory, or degenerative processes, traumatic or developmental events, or neoplastic, vascular, or toxic/metabolic diseases.
B. Loss of function.
1. General. Under this section, loss of function may be due to bone or joint deformity or destruction from any cause; miscellaneous disorders of the spine with or without radiculopathy or other neurological deficits; amputation; or fractures or soft tissue injuries, including burns, requiring prolonged periods of immobility or convalescence. The provisions of 1.02 and 1.03 notwithstanding, inflammatory arthritis is evaluated under 14.09 (see 14.00D6). Impairments with neurological causes are to be evaluated under 11.00ff.
2. How we define loss of function in these listings.
a. General. Regardless of the cause(s) of a musculoskeletal impairment, functional loss for purposes of these listings is defined as the inability to ambulate effectively on a sustained basis for any reason, including pain associated with the underlying musculoskeletal impairment, or the inability to perform fine and gross movements effectively on a sustained basis for any reason, including pain associated with the underlying musculoskeletal impairment. The inability to ambulate effectively or the inability to perform fine and gross movements effectively must have lasted, or be expected to last, for at least 12 months. For the purposes of these criteria, consideration of the ability to perform these activities must be from a physical standpoint alone. When there is an inability to perform these activities due to a mental impairment, the criteria in 12.00ff are to be used. We will determine whether an individual can ambulate effectively or can perform fine and gross movements effectively based on the medical and other evidence in the case record, generally without developing additional evidence about the individual's ability to perform the specific activities listed as examples in 1.00B2b(2) and 1.00B2c.
b. What we mean by inability to ambulate effectively.
(1) Definition. Inability to ambulate effectively means an extreme limitation of the ability to walk; i.e., an impairment(s) that interferes very seriously with the individual's ability to independently initiate, sustain, or complete activities. Ineffective ambulation is defined generally as having insufficient lower extremity functioning (see 1.00J) to permit independent ambulation without the use of a hand-held assistive device(s) that limits the functioning of both upper extremities. (Listing 1.05C is an exception to this general definition because the individual has the use of only one upper extremity due to amputation of a hand.)
(2) To ambulate effectively, individuals must be capable of sustaining a reasonable walking pace over a sufficient distance to be able to carry out activities of daily living. They must have the ability to travel without companion assistance to and from a place of employment or school. Therefore, examples of ineffective ambulation include, but are not limited to, the inability to walk without the use of a walker, two crutches or two canes, the inability to walk a block at a reasonable pace on rough or uneven surfaces, the inability to use standard public transportation, the inability to carry out routine ambulatory activities, such as shopping and banking, and the inability to climb a few steps at a reasonable pace with the use of a single hand rail. The ability to walk independently about one's home without the use of assistive devices does not, in and of itself, constitute effective ambulation.
c. What we mean by inability to perform fine and gross movements effectively. Inability to perform fine and gross movements effectively means an extreme loss of function of both upper extremities; i.e., an impairment(s) that interferes very seriously with the individual's ability to independently initiate, sustain, or complete activities. To use their upper extremities effectively, individuals must be capable of sustaining such functions as reaching, pushing, pulling, grasping, and fingering to be able to carry out activities of daily living. Therefore, examples of inability to perform fine and gross movements effectively include, but are not limited to, the inability to prepare a simple meal and feed oneself, the inability to take care of personal hygiene, the inability to sort and handle papers or files, and the inability to place files in a file cabinet at or above waist level.
d. Pain or other symptoms. Pain or other symptoms may be an important factor contributing to functional loss. In order for pain or other symptoms to be found to affect an individual's ability to perform basic work activities, medical signs or laboratory findings must show the existence of a medically determinable impairment(s) that could reasonably be expected to produce the pain or other symptoms. The musculoskeletal listings that include pain or other symptoms among their criteria also include criteria for limitations in functioning as a result of the listed impairment, including limitations caused by pain. It is, therefore, important to evaluate the intensity and persistence of such pain or other symptoms carefully in order to determine their impact on the individual's functioning under these listings. See also §§ 404.1525(f) and 404.1529 of this part, and §§ 416.925(f) and 416.929 of part 416 of this chapter.
C. Diagnosis and evaluation.
1. General. Diagnosis and evaluation of musculoskeletal impairments should be supported, as applicable, by detailed descriptions of the joints, including ranges of motion, condition of the musculature (e.g., weakness, atrophy), sensory or reflex changes, circulatory deficits, and laboratory findings, including findings on x-ray or other appropriate medically acceptable imaging. Medically acceptable imaging includes, but is not limited to, x-ray imaging, computerized axial tomography (CAT scan) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), with or without contrast material, myelography, and radionuclear bone scans. "Appropriate" means that the technique used is the proper one to support the evaluation and diagnosis of the impairment.
2. Purchase of certain medically acceptable imaging. While any appropriate medically acceptable imaging is useful in establishing the diagnosis of musculoskeletal impairments, some tests, such as CAT scans and MRIs, are quite expensive, and we will not routinely purchase them. Some, such as myelograms, are invasive and may involve significant risk. We will not order such tests. However, when the results of any of these tests are part of the existing evidence in the case record we will consider them together with the other relevant evidence.
Back to Top
 USA.gov: Portal to U.S. government agenciesPrivacy Policy | Website Policies & Other Important Information | Site Map
Last reviewed or modified Friday Jul 06, 2012

Saturday, 27 October 2012

Dr Faigenbaum latest news


http://frankfeigenbaum.com/news/
frankfeigenbaum.com
Read the latest news and events about Dr. Feigenbaum and his patients and treatments.
More info from the link above

Hiding in Plain Sight: Tarlov/Perineural Cysts

Half-Hour Television Documentary

Everyone knows the devastation of cancer yet Tarlov cysts, while more rare and little known, can be every bit as debilitating and life changing. Unfortunately, only a handful of physicians worldwide are knowledgeable about and willing to treat Tarlov cysts.
A television documentary entitled Hiding in Plain Sight: Tarlov/Perineural Cysts features Dr. Frank Feigenbaum as a neurosurgeon devoted to pioneering the challenges of Tarlov cysts. Patients from across the globe are benefitting from his state-of-the-art surgical technique.
For many patients, finding help for Tarlov Cysts Disease is a process that can take months or even years. The half –hour program Hiding in Plain Sight will be carried on public television and is being produced by a group of Emmy-award-winning professionals.

Tarlov perineural cyst, Orphanet database

Orphanet: Search a disease

  1. Homepage
  2. Rare diseases
  3. Search
Powered by Translate

SIMPLE SEARCH

 *
(*) mandatory field 




 

OTHER SEARCH OPTION(S)

Perineural cyst

Orpha numberORPHA65250
Synonym(s)Tarlov cyst
Prevalence>1 / 1000
Inheritance
  • Sporadic
Age of onsetAdulthood
ICD-10-
OMIM-
UMLS-
MeSH-
MedDRA-
SNOMED CT-

SUMMARY

Perineural (or Tarlov) cysts are cerebrospinal fluid-filled nerve root cysts most commonly found at the sacral level of the spine, although they can be found in any section of the spine, which can cause progressively painful radiculopathy. The annual incidence of perineural cysts is estimated at approximately 5%, although large cysts that cause symptoms are relatively rare with annual incidence estimated at less than 1/2,000. Women are affected more frequently than men. Patients with perineural cysts present with pain in the area of the nerves affected by the cyst, muscle weakness, difficulty sitting for prolonged periods, loss of sensation, loss of reflexes, pain when sneezing or coughing, swelling over the sacral area, parasthesias, headaches, sciatica, and bowel, bladder and sexual dysfunction. The cysts typically occur along the posterior nerve roots and can be valved or nonvalved. The main feature that distinguishes perineural cysts from other spinal lesions is the presence of spinal nerve root fibres within the cyst wall or in the cyst cavity. The majority of perineural cysts are sporadic. However, in some cases cysts have been observed among relatives, suggesting the possibility of a familiar trait with autosomal transmission. There are a number of conditions that can cause the cysts to become symptomatic, including traumatic injury, heavy lifting, childbirth, epidurals, and trauma to the spinal cord. It has also been observed that the herpes simplex virus can cause the body chemistry to change and that perineural cyst symptoms worsen during herpes virus outbreaks. Diagnosis is based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed topography (CT) or myelogram of patients experiencing lower back pain or sciatica. The main differential diagnoses are meningeal diverticula and long arachnoid prolongations, which can be distinguished by rapid filling on myelography compared to the delayed filling of perineural cysts. Differential diagnoses also include herniated lumbar discs, arachnoiditis and, in females, gynecological conditions. Treatment involves lumbar drainage of the cerebrospinal fluid, CT scanning-guided cyst aspiration, decompressive laminectomy, cyst and/or nerve root excision and microsurgical cyst fenestration and imbrications. However, surgical treatment for perineural cysts is complicated by postoperative pseudomeningocoele and intracranial hypotension, and recurrence of the cyst. Pain therapy may offer a nonsurgical alternative for the treatment of symptomatic perineural cysts. Those who have progressive and prolonged symptoms may experience neurological damage if the cysts continue to compress nerve structures.

Expert reviewer(s)

  • Dr A CARLUCCIO
  • Pr Antonio FEDERICO
  • Dr D MARINO

Friday, 26 October 2012

Arachnoiditis After Childbirth


Follow on from the Previous Link, 

Arachnoiditis After Childbirth

Matt Clark says only his family has prevented him from killing himself because of constant pain from arachnoiditis.
Epidural injections for anesthesia in childbirth are also associated with arachnoiditis when a doctor inadvertently punctures the dura and a blood patch is used to close up the hole. Dura punctures happen about 4 percent of the time in childbirth.
"It is an irritant to nervous tissue -- even a mother's own blood -- and can produce inflammation and clumping of nerve roots," said Aldrete.
"The picture is painted to them that there are no problems," said Aldrete of the 1.6 million pregnant women who have epidurals for delivery.
"We should let the patient know what complications can occur," he said.
Many doctors tell patients that the worst outcome is that epidural steroid injections "may not work," rather than spelling out the risks.
Anesthesiologist Baker argues that overall, the risks of accidental dural puncture are small, according to medical literature -- about 0.3-1 percent. In obstetrical patients using a "blind" (without an x-ray) technique, the risk rises to 1 percent.
In one Japanese study of 277 patients, none of the 89 patients who received steroids in their spinal fluid because of dural puncture developed arachnoiditis.
Baker estimates at most, the odds of getting arachnoiditis are about 1 in 50,000.
Meningitis Outbreak: 7 People Confirmed Dead, 60 Others Being Treated Watch Video
Meningitis Outbreak: 5 Dead Watch Video
35 Meningitis Cases Blamed on Contaminated Steroid InjectionsWatch Video
Some studies have shown an association between arachnoiditis and exposure to herpes or cytomegalovirus, according to Bertelli.
Two-thirds who develop the condition end up losing bowel or bladder function and some end up bedridden, requiring powerful opiates.
Such was the case with Matt Clark, a 41-year-old father of two from Tennessee. Just hours after receiving an epidural steroid injections for back pain in 2003, parts of his intestines had dropped into his underwear because the epidural had relaxed the muscles in his gut.
Now, felled with arachnoiditis, he is disabled, in permanent pain with stabbing nerve pain in his feet and limbs and the sensation of invisible insects crawling on his skin.
"I am in so much pain," said Clark. "I have been robbed of so many things, and I am told that it is only a matter of time before I am in a wheelchair. I don't want to hurt my family but I truly would pick death over this disease."
He has even considered suicide. "But I can't do that to my boys," said Clark. "They look up to me and love me so much."
Clark compares the overuse of spinal injections to the lobotomies of an earlier century.
"Everyone thought they were a godsend," he said. "Epidural steroid injections are the same thing. Everyone thinks they are wonderful, but they are not. I am going to have this for the rest of my life. It's horrible."
Bertelli, whose condition has stabilized with medications, said she feels the same way. She is still in pain and has spent thousands of dollars on treatments.
"I would not wish this on anyone," she said. "It's been the worst experience of my life and so hard, especially on my loved ones. I am living with the pain, but it hits you and you try not to cry and maintain a smile -- it's important with little kids.
    Questions to ask your doctor before receiving an epidural steroid injection [From Dr. Ray M. Baker]:
  • What is the provider's training? Fellowship trained? Weekend course? Mentored?
  • Do they use fluoroscopy on all injections?
  • Have they had major complication(s)? How many?
  • What percentage of their practice is dedicated to interventions?
  • Do they occasionally perform spinal injections as a small part of a busy radiology, psychiatry, surgical or pain practice, or are spinal interventions a larger part of their practice?
For support and more information, go to Arachnoiditis USA or The A WordArachnoiditis Society for Awareness and Prevention


Epidural Steroid Injection Risk: Incurable Arachnoiditis - ABC News

Epidural Steroid Injection Risk: Incurable Arachnoiditis - ABC News
more from the above link, xx soft hugs xx



Helen Bertelli, a mother of two young girls from Raleigh, N.C., has been crippled with weird symptoms -- electric shocks, muscle cramps and the sensation that water is running down her legs -- all since she received an epidural steroid injection for back pain in 2011.
Three months after a medical "fellow" administered the shot at a pain clinic, she had trouble urinating, then both her feet went numb.
"I had this feeling I was connected to the end of a guitar string and someone was plucking it," said Bertelli, 36, and a former runner and hiker. "My legs just exploded like there were fireworks in them. My muscles twitched like they were boiling."
For months doctors told her the knife-like pains were in her head, but six months later, Bertelli was diagnosed with arachnoiditis, an incurable condition that can be associated with epidural steroid injections.
Today, she tells ABCNews.com, "I feel I have been dropped into a nightmare with no hope of waking up."
Arachnoiditis is not fungal meningitis. The outbreak that killed 23 and infected 308 patients nationwide was linked to contaminated steroid solution prepared by a Massachusetts compounding pharmacy.
What Bertelli has is a pain disorder caused by the inflammation of the arachnoid, a delicate spider web-like membrane that surrounds and protects the spinal nerves, spinal cord and brain. The three most common causes are surgery, infection and chemical irritation.
Meningitis Outbreak: 7 People Confirmed Dead, 60 Others Being Treated Watch Video
Meningitis Outbreak: 5 Dead Watch Video
35 Meningitis Cases Blamed on Contaminated Steroid InjectionsWatch Video
"It's rare," said Dr. Ray M. Baker, an anesthesiologist and president of the International Spine Intervention Society.
But advocates, including Baker, say that the rising number of epidural steroid injections -- many performed by untrained clinicians -- signals the need for better medical and patient education about risks.
There is some evidence linking the preservatives in steroid medication to arachnoiditis, when the medication is accidentally injected into the spinal fluid. Fluoroscopic (x-ray) guidance is useful with spinal injections, as it confirms needle placement outside of the spinal fluid and allows for safe injection, according to Baker.
"With the right hands, the right skill set and the right patient and the right conditions, they are safe and quite effective," said Baker. "We don't have a lot of policing or oversight to say what are the standards and the rules."
And consumers don't know what a "quality job" is, he said.
"Although the fungal meningitis outbreak is a horrible tragedy, we need to be looking at lessons learned," he told ABCNews.com.
"If any good can come from this, in addition to shining a light on the need for greater oversight of compounding pharmacies, it might be that the media attention on steroid injections will allow patients to become better-informed consumers. For patients, it is buyer beware."
An estimated 5 million epidural steroid injections were performed in the United States in 2011, based on data from Medicare, which pays for about half of all such procedures.
"If I were a patient, I would start asking questions," said Baker. "As with other things in life, skill, training and experience matter. ...For the sake of patient safety, and to maintain public trust, spinal interventions should not be the domain of anyone and everyone."
A patient group, led by Bertelli, has urged the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to provide more comprehensive training of the practice, better oversight of physicians and better patient consent forms that include arachnoiditis as a potential complication.
She also wants better tracking of adverse events and better guidelines for doctors on contraindications.